Wordle buyout by New York Times draws backlash from fans

The New York Times Co’s acquisition of Wordle has created uproar on social media, with fans expressing fears that the popular online word game, which is currently free to play, might be put behind a paywall.

Announcing on Monday that it had bought Wordle for an undisclosed price in the low seven figures, the Times said the game would “initially” remain free for existing and new players.

That wording led some social media users to suggest the media company would soon allow only subscribers access.

“I have never seen Twitter as immediately mad as it is about the NYT Wordle buyout,” one user tweeted. “The NYT took one nice and simple thing that a lot of people really liked, a dumb bit of fun in our exhaustingly dark times, and implied that they’ll stick it behind a paywall.”

After creating Wordle to play with his girlfriend Palak Shah, software engineer Josh Wardle released it to the public in October. Within months it became a global phenomenon, with celebrities such as Trevor Noah joining the bandwagon.

The once-a-day online game gives a player six chances to figure out a five-letter word, using the least number of guesses.

“I would be lying if I said this hasn’t been a little overwhelming,” Wardle said on a post on Twitter. “After all, I am just one person, and it is important to me that, as Wordle grows, it continues to provide a great experience to everyone.”

The Times said it expects the acquisition to broaden its digital content as it tries to reach the goal of 10 million subscribers by 2025.

The newspaper was an early adopter of the paywall when it started digital subscription plans back in 2011. That strategy helped it buck the trend of falling print revenues and build a digital business.

It has also bought into other digital media such as subscription-based audio app Audm and product review website Wirecutter. Last month it agreed to pay $550 million in cash for sports site The Athletic.

As the Times also seeks to grow paid readers outside its core news content, games and puzzles have become a key part of a strategy to keep its audience engaged on its apps and websites.

Its Games unit, which has more than one million subscriptions, started with the Daily Crossword, and later launched games such as Spelling Bee, Tiles, Letter Boxed and Vertex.

Source: Thai Public Broadcasting Service

Biden says he will designate Qatar as a major non-NATO US ally

US President Joe Biden revealed Monday that he would designate Qatar as a major non-NATO ally, joining the likes of Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan and Kuwait, Trend reports citing Al Arabiya.

“I am notifying Congress that I will designate Qatar as a major non-NATO ally to reflect the importance of our relationship, I think it’s long overdue,” Biden said ahead of his meeting with the Qatari emir.

The White House said Biden’s meeting with Qatar’s Tamim bin Hamad al-Thani would focus on the latest developments in the Middle East, the situation in Afghanistan and global energy security.

For his part, the Qatari emir said the discussions would include the “equal rights of Palestinian people.”

Washington is looking to Qatar as part of its efforts to secure alternative energy supplies for Europe as tensions with Russia over a potential invasion of Ukraine linger.

“This past year our partnership with Qatar has been central to many of our most vital interests: relocating tens of thousands of Afghans, maintaining stability in Gaza and providing life-saving assistance to the Palestinians, keeping pressure on ISIS and deterring threats across the Middle East,” Biden said.

Qatar also represents US diplomatic interests in Afghanistan, following the chaotic withdrawal ordered by Biden last summer.

Other major non-NATO allies include Afghanistan, Argentina, Australia, Bahrain, Brazil, Egypt, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Korea, Kuwait, Morocco, New Zealand, Pakistan, the Philippines, Thailand, and Tunisia.

Taiwan is treated as a major non-NATO ally but without a formal designation.

The status, under US law, “provides foreign partners with certain benefits in the areas of defense trade and security cooperation.”

But there are no security commitments to these capitals.

Earlier in the day, al-Thani met with US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin at the Pentagon. Ahead of their meeting, Austin said the US defense partnership with Qatar was wrong and served “as a cornerstone for our strategic relationship.”

Austin thanked Qatar for hosting US troops. “This allows the United States to support a range of critical missions in the region,” he said.

Source: Trend News Agency

Cabinet acknowledges plan for Bangkok governor election in May

The Thai cabinet acknowledged today (Tuesday) the Interior Ministry’s plan to hold the elections for Bangkok’s governor, city and district councillors in May, according to Deputy Prime Minister Wissanu Krea-ngam.

He said that the countdown to the elections will start in March, because the Election Commission will need time to make preparations, such as the list of eligible voters in all districts of the capital, the exact timeline for the election, registration of candidates as well as the certification of local elections, which are still not completed.

If all these preparatory steps are completed, the elections are expected to take place in May, said the deputy prime minister.

Regarding the election of the mayor of Pattaya City, he said the Interior Ministry had informed the cabinet that the ministry is ready for the poll, but the Election Commission remains tied up with the issue of the multi-constituency electoral system and, therefore, is unable to confirm that it will be able to hold the election concurrently with the one in Bangkok.

The last Bangkok governor’s election was held in 2013, with M.R. Sukhumbhand Paribatra of the Democrat party re-elected for the second term. His term was cut short when he was sacked in 2016 by coup leader, General Prayut Chan-o-cha, following an investigation by the Office of the Attorney General over the expenditure of 39.5 million baht on a light show erected in front of the city hall.

Invoking Section 44 of the interim constitution, General Prayut appointed Pol Gen Aswin Kwanmuang the new governor, succeeding Sukhumbhand.

Source: Thai Public Broadcasting Service

Big defeat in Bangkok could be beginning of end for Prayut’s government: analysts

Predictions of defeat for the ruling Palang Pracharath Party were being made several days before last Sunday’s Constituency 9 by-election in Bangkok, but few analysts expected such a devastating loss.

Palang Pracharath’s candidate Saranrat Jenjaka attracted just 7,906 votes – less than a quarter of the 34,907 votes received by her husband Sira when he won the same MP seat in the March 2019 general election, also as a Palang Pracharath candidate.

Surachart Thienthong from the opposition Pheu Thai Party won on Sunday with 29,416 votes, down from the 32,115 he received as runner-up behind Sira in 2009.

Actor-turned-politician Krunphol Tiansuwan from the opposition Move Forward Party came second, with 20,361 votes, followed by Kla Party secretary-general Atavit Suwannapakdee, who garnered 20,047 votes. Saranrat came a distant fourth.

This was Pheu Thai’s first by-election victory during the current parliamentary term. Candidates from coalition parties have won seven of the nine by-elections held since the March 2019 general election, with the now-defunct opposition Future Forward Party securing one win.

Voter turnout on Sunday dropped significantly from the 2019 general election. Only 52 percent of eligible voters (88,000 people) cast their ballots, compared to 74 percent (120,000) in 2019.

Why did Palang Pracharath lose?

Analysts said Palang Pracharath’s defeat reflected the falling popularity of Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha and his government.

The party’s campaign strategy was also partly blamed for the loss. Days before the vote, Palang Pracharath opted for the slogan “If you love Uncle Tu and like Uncle Pom, vote for number 7”, referring to PM Prayut and party leader Prawit Wongsuwan respectively.

“[The defeat] was caused by the government’s lack of legitimacy and failure to tackle COVID-19, as well as the economic downturn following the pandemic,” said Yuthaporn Issarachai, a political scientist from Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University

Sunday marked the ruling party’s third consecutive by-election defeat in January. The loss in Bangkok was preceded by defeat at the Jan 16 Songkhla and Chumphon by-elections to the Democrat Party, a fellow member of the coalition government.

“Prawit has lost his magic while Prayut should have known that his popularity is not the same [as it was at the 2019 general election],” Yuthaporn said.

However, Stithorn Thananithichot, director of the Office of Innovation for Democracy at King Prajadhipok’s Institute, took a different view, insisting voters just wanted to hand a warning or lesson to Prayut and Palang Pracharath.

“I don’t think the PM’s supporters in Bangkok have turned their backs on him. Instead, they want him to improve or make changes,” said Stithorn.

He added that Palang Pracharath had limited its campaign efforts after realizing that Saranrat could not win.

Contest between allies

Another reason for Palang Pracharath’s loss was competition from other conservative parties. Palang Pracharath lost about 27,000 votes compared to 2019, while new parties like Kla and Thai Pakdee made substantial gains in their election debuts.

The royalist Thai Pakdee acquired almost 6,000 votes while the neo-conservative Kla received more than 20,000. Many of these votes are thought to have come from those who voted for Sira in 2019 and from supporters of the coalition Democrat Party, which drew over 16,000 votes in 2019 but came fourth.

If all votes for the conservative camp were combined, the total would easily surpass that of Pheu Thai’s Surachart.

The Democrats opted out of Sunday’s by-election, citing political etiquette that coalition parties should not contest for a seat lost by an ally. The MP seat was left vacant after the Constitutional Court disqualified Sira over his criminal conviction back in 1995.

Second-place Move Forward’s support dropped by around 5,000 votes compared to the 2019 election, when its predecessor, Future Forward Party, attracted an impressive 25,735 votes to land third.

Meanwhile, Saranrat was not viewed as a strong candidate, and her cause was not helped by Sira’s reputation. His behavior while serving as an MP led to public dissatisfaction and a negative image, which could have rebounded on his wife.

Surprise votes from soldiers

Despite its loss, Move Forward can boast a victory for gaining a substantial number of votes at two polling stations inside a military camp, which helped it win second place.

Unlike previous elections that saw reports of military officers instructing troops who to vote for, soldiers and their families seemed to get the green light to vote freely on Sunday, said political pundit Wanwichit Boonprong from Rangsit University.

“I think the party’s campaign for reform of the military, especially the push to improve the welfare of low-ranking soldiers, touched their hearts,” said Wanwichit.

Move Forward focused on these points during their campaigning in the barracks.

Meanwhile, Yuthaporn questioned whether former junta members in the government still had influence over the military.

For some analysts, the fact that Move Forward managed to secure second place amid low voter turnout indicated its potential to build momentum for the next election in Bangkok.

“The party has the chance to ignite a Move Forward fever in Bangkok,” said Stithorn.

He noted that the party’s candidate Krunphol joined the race just one month before the by-election yet managed to gain as much support as candidates who have built their base in the constituency for 20 years.

Move Forward’s gain could put Pheu Thai at a disadvantage in the next national polls as the two parties share the same support base, said the analyst.

Extinction in Bangkok?

After such a devastating loss, Palang Pracharath’s prospects in the next election are uncertain, say critics, who now expect more MPs to defect from the party.

“I’m convinced that the party could win fewer MP seats in Bangkok than they expect – or that they could even become extinct [in the city],” Wanwichit said.

For him, new parties like Kla and Sarng Anacot Thai, formed by former economic ministers in the current government, could be more appealing to Bangkok voters. Even the Democrats, who failed to win any Bangkok MP seats in 2019, could become attractive again.

“Palang Pracharath has lost its appeal and failed to deliver its campaign promises,” said the analyst.

“Even if the ruling party continues supporting Prayut as its PM candidate [at the next general election], other parties such as Kla or the ultra-rightist Thai Pakdee can do the same. So, it will have to share the same support base with the two other parties.”

The 2019 general election saw Palang Pracharath win most MP seats in Bangkok with 12, while Pheu Thai and Future Forward each won nine.

Meanwhile, political analyst and former Ramkhamhaeng University rector Sukhum Nuansakun expects Palang Pracharath to suffer in the next general election, shrinking to become a middle-sized party.

Delay for gubernatorial vote

Observers are convinced that the ruling party’s big loss in Bangkok could further delay the next gubernatorial election, which had been expected in the middle of this year. They said those in power would not allow the election to go ahead until they are certain of securing a win.

“But the later the election is held, the more damage for Prayut and the ruling party,” said Wanwichit.

Holding it early could help the party evaluate Bangkok’s political landscape and give clues on how to make a comeback in the national election, he added.

Source: Thai Public Broadcasting Service

Cabinet agrees in principle to P-move’s demand for land rights

Thailand’s cabinet today (Tuesday) approved, in principle, P-move activists and civic groups’ 15-point demand for mechanisms to ensure the basic rights of ethnic minorities to land settlement, community land title deeds and settlement of land disputes with the State Railway of Thailand and with Ban Bang Kloi land in Kaeng Krachan national park.

P-move demonstrators have been protesting in Bangkok for weeks, to press their demands, and have organized protest marches to Government House on several occasions, but without success until now.

They marched to Government House again today, determined to keep pressure on the government.

At about 2pm, the protesters removed the razor wire and barricade erected in front of Government House and staged a sit-down protest in front of a police cordon.

At about 4pm, Prime Minister’s Office Minister Anucha Nakasai came out of Government House to inform the protesters that the cabinet had agreed, in principle, to their demands and to withdraw all the charges against the ethnic Karen villagers of Ban Bang Kloi settlement in Kaeng Krachan national park in Phetchaburi province.

Deputy Government Spokesperson Rachada Dhnadirek later said that some of the issues in their demands are related to policies and, hence, must be considered by relevant agencies, with recommendations to be made on how to solve the problem in line with the law.

Regarding land disputes with the State Railway of Thailand by land encroachers, the cabinet instructed the SRT to let the poor land settlers to lease its land for a period of one year at 20 baht per square metre per year and to ask the court to delay legal proceedings against the settlers while they are in the process of renting the land from the SRT.

Source: Thai Public Broadcasting Service