Nivatchai" waits to see the court's decision after the NACC ruled that the NACC did not perform its duties properly in the case. "Father and son Wilawan" invade the Khao Yai forest, insisting they will not lose, with strong evidence. If the NACC doesn't do it, who will fight against the influential people?
Mr. Niwatchai Kasemmongkol, Secretary-General of the NACC, mentioned the case where the Criminal Court for Corruption and Misconduct, Region 2, Rayong Province, dismissed the charges against Mr. Sunthorn Vilawan, the president of the Prachinburi Provincial Administrative Organization. and Mrs. Kanokwan Vilawan, former Deputy Minister of Education, and 8 others in the case that the committee NACC finds fault in the case of encroaching on national forest land in Khao Yai Province. Prachinburi in the year 2002 that the dismissal of the said lawsuit was made by the Court of First Instance. There will be an appeal in some cases. In this matter, we must bring judgment to the decision. At present, we have not yet received the full verdict that will look at each issue. What are the issues that the court dismissed? Especially regarding the intention of knowing or not knowing that there was an encroachment at the national park. Including the case of whether it is the boundary of the park or not. If so, we need to see if there was any intent to invade or not. At this point, we still haven't seen the verdict. So I'm not sure if the court has ruled on whether the land that came into possession is park land or not. Because from our proof We have aerial photos. Including it corresponds to what the park analyzed as land belonging to the National Park Department. Therefore, you may have to look at the judgment here first to see how it was determined. Then go look at the actions and see if it's true. Is the entry there intentional or not? But today I haven't seen the details. Therefore, it has not yet been specified which issues will be appealed. You may have to look at the judgment here first to see how it was determined. Then go look at the actions and see if it's true. Is the entry there intentional or not? But today I haven't seen the details. Therefore, it has not yet been specified which issues will be appealed. You may have to look at the judgment here first to see how it was determined. Then go look at the actions and see if it's true. Is the entry there intentional or not? But today I haven't seen the details. Therefore, it has not yet been specified which issues will be appealed.
“There is a time frame for filing an appeal. only that it may be expanded But confirm that it will not be soon. Because if you look at the issue for just a moment, you'll already know. What are the court's considerations? What is the reason?” Mr. Niwatchai said.
For cases where the court states that NACC investigates illegally will affect the work of NACC or not, Mr. Niwatchai said today it may be necessary to see how the court ruled that it was illegal. Is it an issue or not? On the issue of accusations against Mr. Sunthorn or not? Because the court must consider the request or the submission. As for the decision, it may be necessary to look at what evidence you have that the NACC improperly investigated. It must be clear which issue What is evidence? It is most important because we are in the justice process together. This work must be seen first. We can criticize each other. However, we respect discretion. But in the part that has an impact Some people may say NACC performs its duties incorrectly and can sue NACC.
When asked again, If Mr. Sunthorn wants to sue the NACC, what will he do? Mr. Niwatchai said that it is already the right of the accused. If it is seen that the work of the audit team is a malfeasance What are the corrupt behaviors? Because today victims can file complaints directly with the Criminal Court for corruption cases. Today, as a result of what the NACC does, we must take responsibility for what we do. This one must be accepted. But what is the evidence?
In this regard, it is confirmed that the expressions were made firmly. Because the results of the inspection are consistent with what the National Park Service has scientifically verified. using technology They didn't use people to point out, there were maps, there were aerial photographs taken. Processed
“And I asked where the reporter went to see the condition, right? Let's just say, a reasonable person who went to see the condition of the forest that day. Is it a forest? Or is it someone who was a farmer before? Therefore, I say that this is what we have to look at based on the facts. Today, the NACC is working to claim natural resources back to the land. We are working, are we not trying to incriminate us? Slander someone NACC also took reporters out to see the work on various things. We have seen that today our natural resources are being destroyed. He hid away Go out and issue rights documents, issue all sorts of things. Today, if the NACC doesn't do it, I don't know who will. Because the people who do it have influence,” Mr. Niwatchai said.
The reporter asked: Has the backlash made you discouraged or not with your work? The NACC secretary said that he thought it made him discouraged or not. NACC strengthened We must check to see what we have done that is still flawed, lacking, but never defeated. It's a duty that we have to do. If we don't do it, who will? He created this organization to work with influential people or politicians who are doing wrongful acts. He insists that he will do his best. Mr. Niwatchai also mentioned the case of Ms. Kanokwan. that is still in the floor of Another expression of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) It will affect the work of the NACC. It must be more strict. Must look at the facts that the court has decided first. Today we have to wait for the verdict. Because we don't know the details of your diagnosis. If we take a look at it, we might use it to fill additional gaps. However He thinks that every case that we work on is stable in every case. Thai News Agency
Source: Thai News Agency