Parliament 21 Sep. - "Rome" is too disappointed to accept that "Chor Pannika" has been deprived of her political rights. Ask: What is the standard - fairness? Taking him to jail is less severe. Is it because of boredom? "Moving forward - a new future" and said he understands "Piyabutr" may be distressed because he has been on the battlefield together. But everyone expressed it differently.
Mr. Rangsiman Rome, list MP for the Progressive Party Gave an interview about the case of the Supreme Court ruling that Ms. Pannika Wanich withdrew her right to apply for election. and has no right to hold political office for the rest of his life, stating that he does not know his political objectives But it must be said that this is a political death sentence. Which is difficult to accept. Personally, I think it's so severe that I'm very disappointed with what happened. If it is determined that there is some behavior that violates any section of the Criminal Code. And then coming to prosecute ethics cases, it's still understandable. But in this case, there are no such facts at all. Therefore, it is considered that the legal action against Ms. Pannika The law is written broadly. We don't know if deleting a post is an act of abstinence or not. Normally, the law must be clear about what is and should be done. It's something that shouldn't be done. Relying on ethical standards and setting a broad framework and make the case have such severe consequences He thought it was too difficult to bear. He would like to appeal to those in the justice process. That you should not be complacent about this matter. Because people who don't agree with Ms. Pannika saw that it was something that was difficult to accept. which had previously complained to the Judiciary Committee that a judge had committed a serious misconduct Until today there has been no progress.
“The charges I filed are much more severe. What is the standard of fairness? Or, finally, is it because the party has advanced? It's because Khun Chor is a former member of the Future Forward Party. Therefore, it may lead to such severe action,” Mr. Rangsiman said.
For the case of Mr. Piyabutr Saengkanokkul, leader of the Progress Party Came out to express his opinion that the Progressive Party has shown delay. And that spirit is dry Mr. Rangsiman said that we also feel with what happened to Ms. Pannika, and we also thought that Feelings have been expressed through different channels. He understood Mr. Piyabutr's purpose. that Mr. Piyabutr may be distressed by what happened We have been through the battlefield. We ourselves have experienced such a phenomenon. After hearing the news, he telephoned to talk with Ms. Pannika. I understood that it was something very serious. And he thinks that the right to run for election is a right guaranteed in the Constitution. It should not be easily eliminated like this.
When asked if there may be other people in the Progressive Party who have been involved in similar cases, how will they be protected? Mr. Rangsiman Rome said that it is difficult to defend because the ethics are not clearly written. If compared to a criminal case of murder, what are the clear punishments for behavior? But ethics is an abstract characteristic of being open. Using the power of the authorized person to do anything, therefore, clear standards or principles are very difficult. In the end, the court or the authorized organization must use its own discretion continuously. In the end, he had to make decisions that were increasingly contrary to the principles of common sense. How will Thai society live? It turns out that politicians have a chance to be attacked at any time. On the contrary We have been exposing civil servants for 5 years and today everyone is still living happily.
“What is fairness to us? You may disagree with the Progressive Party on some matters. May hate the Progressive Party for many things But let's be honest. You will use all means of power without regard to legal merit. What are the legal principles? Is it really worth doing this? Probably everyone will have to shut down Facebook,” Mr. Rangsiman said.
Mr. Rangsiman added that he understands what stories each person has posted. At that time, what were your feelings and thoughts about growing up? Each person's maturity and role are different. Some people post and then forget. Come see me later. There is no law that tells you to delete it. So what's happening is that we don't have any standards before. and used very serious accusations Let's create a standard by taking people's lives as the standard. He thought it was unfair. “Whatever you are worried about or afraid of will never happen. And asking for various attacks, I think it's unfair. Therefore, I think that organizations like the court really want to be committed to justice. For many people, putting him in jail is less severe. The right to apply for election is even for the rest of my life,” Mr. Rangsiman said. Thai News Agency
Source: Thai News Agency