Election Commission of Thailand, May 11 – “Srisuwan” prepares to submit evidence for the examination of “Pita” holding media shares, not repeating “Thanathorn” in violation of the prohibited qualifications of being an MP candidate, believing the EC to submit to the court. constitution ruling did not intercept the last curve before the election but should clear himself before becoming a politician Revealing the words in the case of “Srettha” giving away digital money Fear of latent motivating people to choose
Mr. Srisuwan Janya, secretary-general of the Association for the Protection of the Thai Constitution gave an interview after giving statements to the Office of the Election Commission of Thailand (ECT) in the case of Mr. Srettha Thavisin, Pheu Thai Party’s prime ministerial candidate Speech to give away digital money that today, the Election Commission of Thailand invited to give a statement to confirm the documentary evidence. After finding information, it may violate Act on the Election of MPs 2018, Section 73 (1) (5) that specifies the distribution of property. or any other item of monetary value And it is a hidden policy that motivates people to choose for themselves. which is seen as an important issue and may affect the national economy in the future So called to give more words. Expected to enter all ECT meetings, personally expected to be completed within 2 weeks.
As for the additional documents submitted by the Election Commission, there are cabinet resolution documents that approve the 2024 budget of about 3.33 trillion baht, and this amount is expected to have enough budget for the new government to use, only 200 billion baht, so it is interesting. Note that the Pheu Thai Party’s 70 policies, which require a budget of 3 trillion baht, especially the digital payment policy that requires a budget of 560 billion baht, cannot be achieved.
Mr. Srisuwan said that while the Pheu Thai Party clarified details with the Election Commission of Thailand according to the Act on Political Parties It is unclear how the budget will be used. and cannot confirm whether it can actually be done or not because there are no clear details In addition, in the event that the Pheu Thai Party came out and said that there would be another 100 billion baht in money from the economic multiplier, but in fact, the Pheu Thai Party’s money distribution policy Must use a budget of 5.6 billion baht immediately. It is impossible to use the budget from the future. Digital Payment Policy Therefore, it is too extreme a populist policy. This will be a problem affecting the national economy, so I want the Election Commission to issue a decision as soon as possible. Although the timeframe may not be before the election.
Mr. Srisuwan also gave an interview in the event that Mr. Phitha Lim Chareonrat far-reaching party leader Holding shares of ITV media that Earlier, I received the same piece of evidence as Mr. Ruangkrai Leekitwattana, which is evidence from the Department of Business Development. In this regard, there is a case study from Mr. Chanchai Issara Senarak, a candidate for MP in the 2nd constituency, Nakhon Nayok Province, is already there. The ECT should have issued an order prohibiting applications and asking Mr. Phitha to make excuses in the Supreme Court, but the ECT remained silent, refusing to take action. which if the election is completed must submit a request to the Constitutional Court alone
As for Mr. Phitha Stated that it had clarified to the NACC and saw that it was still unclear. Although the secretary-general of the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) came out to make a statement because it was found that Mr. Phitha’s original documentary evidence Submitting to show the account of assets and liabilities to the NACC does not specify information on ITV holdings, while the NACC has never disclosed evidence to the press and the public. There are only vain words from the NACC secretary who personally thinks that they are unreliable.
“Mr. Phitha’s shareholding will not repeat Mr. Thanathorn’s. due to Mr. Thanathorn’s shareholding It is a type of print media. As for ITV, it is a television media. The difference is that ITV was ordered to close in 2007 when it did not file the company’s closure and there was still a shareholders’ meeting. Including the company to invest in activities related to the media. Claiming to be closed, probably not. considered that this matter would definitely reach the Constitutional Court Because it is a hot taro, the Election Commission would not diagnose it by itself, ”said Srisuwan.
Mr. Srisuwan said that the documents to be submitted to the Election Commission of Thailand are different from Mr. Ruangkrai. Which will be related to the Civil and Commercial Code under section 1559 by himself used to be the trustee of his father When doing any juristic act, any document that appears in the name of the deceased father Himself as an administrator of the estate If not specified to whom the inheritance will be given Government agencies and officials convert that name to their own. which is the child immediately This means that the property can be used to do any juristic act, so the documents that appear in the name of Mr. Phitha There is no parenthesis that as the trustee. This means that Mr. Phitha can take any action. with this stock There is no need for documents or court orders in the matter of appointing an administrator of the estate. Explained is not a fact.
As for the view that Mr. Phitha’s shareholding petition It’s a game of hindering the party’s progress. Mr. Srisuwan said it would be a game of blocking the legs. Because every election, there will be complaints about whether a candidate or a political party violates the law or not. It is common to have complaints during elections. can be seen as a leg scrub But personally, I think that candidates for MPs or those who will become politicians must clear themselves from the start. Thinking of being a politician You should not let other people find fault like this.
Source: Thai News Agency