Srinakarin, "Pitha" says he is working in the present. After a discussion similar to Thing Thuan, he stated that he regretted the past 7 months. The country lost an opportunity About to request an extension of time - exercise the right to inquire Fight the case to dissolve the party The law has many sections. You have to look at the spirit. If dissolving a party, discretion must be used. Pointing out that dissolving a party to destroy politics is a way to turbocharge the dissolved party to gain a handicap in the next election. Mr. Pitha Limjaroenrat The Advisory Chairman to the Leader of the Progressive Party and the MPs from the Progressive Party list gave an interview before the 2024 Annual General Meeting today about the general discussion under Section 152 in the past, which he himself stated may be the first time. Finally, in the life of working in the House of Representatives, including MPs in the party, they all posted messages in the same way, saying, "Not at all," as they said, it is work that is i n the present. Come do your best. That day was a discussion about Section 152 that was said to be a pity. People are disappointed in the country's opportunities, which were actually able to do a lot in the past 7 months. Facts and information have been cleared up that have suggested that it is probably time to reshuffle the Cabinet now so that ineffective people can be removed. to allow effective people to enter Confirming that the country's ability to meet the challenges in time Whether it's about forest fires that haven't stopped or PM 2.5 that hasn't stopped. Whether it is the slowest growing economy in ASEAN After Myanmar, as the world bank just said, it must all be adjusted. Including education is important. At the same time, there are things that we agree on. MP Rangsiman Rome, who agrees with the Minister of Digital Economy and Society, etc. It is only straightforward. It's just that our work is straightforward and complete. 'As the party leader said, there are a lot of details. It's a different arti cle, a different law. We'll have to look at the details. and see that we must exercise our right to request an extension of time and request the right to inquire Until the legal battle can be fought properly Because this matter was punished much more severely than last time. Last time it was only used as a deterrent. We still have rights to the garden. But this time it was to the point of dissolving the party. Kill all political life It should be given the right to expand in detail and be fought to the utmost. It will end all the scandals. And when looking at the details, if the boss agrees Continue to exercise the right to extend time and request the right to a hearing. In fighting this case as well It would be impossible to think that it was the same as the original case,' Mr. Pitha said. When asked whether the ruling using the word corrosion and subversion will be a precursor to the dissolution of the party or not, The law has many sections. It must be seen what the intention is in that section. If the ac tion is prevented, there will be a certain proportion. If it is a matter of political execution Especially destroying the number one opposition party. It's not just affecting the Progressive Party. But it will affect the democratic system. of which the opposition is an important part Therefore, different forms of discretion must be used. Or it means that there has been an original decision. This does not mean that the weight of the penalty must be the same. Therefore, it will take time to make a legal defense statement. Ready to confirm that in terms of moving forward, he doesn't feel shaken at all. or did not feel afraid of anything But the best answer is to make the people and party members confident. If your mind is in trouble, you will not be able to debate according to Section 152 like the past 2 days, confirming that every MP is still fully discussing, punching with all his might. Mr. Pitha further said that from listening to the opinions of every political party. which did not agree with the penalty f or dissolving the party Therefore, he asked the media to ask the elected politicians whether they agreed with the dissolution of the party in order to destroy politics. It has been 20 years since the dissolution of political parties. If this is the 4th or 5th time, we must see whether it is reasonable or not. This is not a matter of a single progressive party. But it is a matter of the democratic system. Therefore, I would like to call on all parties to come back and fight in the system. Winning is winning, losing is losing. Personally, I do not know who has the power to dissolve the party. Have you asked yourself what you will get if you dissolve the party? Which in the short term may weaken the dissolved party. It weakens the number one opposition. But in the long run, at the same time, it is turbocharged. This gives the dissolved party a political advantage in the next election. Source: Thai News Agency